And here the word service could mean everything: from software, to music.
This usually start with a dialogue like this:
Somebody: "Use Word. Now!"
Me: "I haven't got a license for Microsoft Word"
S: "I can burn you a DVD"
Me: "Still, I wouldn't have a license for Microsoft Word"
You can change "Word" with whatever you like, I'm sure most of the PC you're using are stacked up with mp3 or software you haven't paid for, even if you should.
I made a living out of programming, that's why I'm more sensitive about software than other things, but the point is the same. A world is really free if somebody wants to be paid for the work he's done. Period.
Don't flame me before reading on. I'm always been a supporter of free software and I couldn't even imagine a world without it! My workstation wouldn't even have an OS installed, in that case. Myself, I gave for free many of the things I've done. But in those case, it was me who wanted that software to be free. Paying for commercial software not only is an obligation; it's also an act of respect and appreciation towards people who worked for that piece of software to be as good for you. You chose it and you paid for it, there's some reason why.
In a world without free software, I wouldn't approve the use of unlicensed software either. But in a world full of alternatives, I cannot understand why some people simply ignore alternatives and stick with illegally hijacking software. On one hand, you're performing an illicity; on the other hand you're also damaging the community you could be member of if you only chose a free software that fitted your needs. Being an user is one of the most valuable ways you can contribute to the community: you could give impressions, spread the software, write documentation and, obviously, report bugs.
OpenOffice instead of Microsoft Office? Sure, they're not the same thing. But I'm sure that OpenOffice is as much as suitable as Microsoft Office, for the average user. Are you using some complex Visual Basic macro? Are you developing programs using automation? Probably no... And even if you were, OpenOffice could probably be the tool for you. As far as it concerns my own experience, the typical user uses just a small percentage of Microsoft Office functionality. Just the small percentage that made notice no difference, if you just switched.
Or maybe you're burning your CDs and DVDs using some commercial application, while you could use some valid free alternatives.
They're plenty of examples, right there in your PCs.
The typical vicious circle I detect is the following reasoning: "CDs are expensive and average low quality (artistically speaking)... That's why I don't pay for them. Producers are losing money so prices continue to rise." Well, who's the guilty? That's an
infinite loop. I just think that, if I like something and I can afford it, I buy it. That's just the compensation I deserve for my own work, why shouldn't I pay for somebody else's? If you don't like it, don't buy it, that's freedom (of choice, too). But why stealing something you don't like?
Another reasoning is driven by envy: "I'm not paying twenty bucks to an incredibly rich guy that could live without them for the following two hundred years." So what? If you like it, that's something good into it, isn't it? And if he's rich, well... in part it could be part of the game (he's a rock star while you're not), in part could a bit of luck (maybe you're as skilled as him, but your glory days hasn't come, yet), in part it could simply be that he deserves the millions he earns, while you don't. It tastes bitter, probably, but those are the rules.
Shivering? You shouldn't. If you, like I do, wake up every morning and go to an office, you do it because you like it, maybe, but because they pay you for it, too. And you're probably striving to get better conditions or higher responsibility. Every day. Why? Because you think you deserve it.
That's the real point. Don't steal, just choose. And give a reward to somebody who deserves it.